psi | bar | rounded |
33 | 2.275 | 2.3 |
34 | 2.344 | 2.3 |
35 | 2.413 | 2.4 |
36 | 2.482 | 2.5 |
37 | 2.551 | 2.6 |
38 | 2.62 | 2.6 |
My apologies if this has already been covered before. My manual tire pressure gauge shows 33 pounds for all 4 tires, but the car display shows 33 and 35 pounds. Not sure why that is.
Has anyone else had this experience?
Dan
Thank you, this is helpful!I believe the system is fundamentally set up to report to a tenth of a bar. Here are some relevant pressures:
psi bar rounded 33 2.275 2.3 34 2.344 2.3 35 2.413 2.4 36 2.482 2.5 37 2.551 2.6 38 2.62 2.6
I never see my car report pressures of 34 or 37 pounds - because they are "covered" by rounded pressures of 2.3 and 2.6 bar, respectively. Since 0.1 bar is more than a psi, we effectively lose resolution in our units.
I wouldn't expect either the car or a gauge to be perfect. A good hand held gauge may be accurate to 1% of its full range, say 0.01 x 60 = 0.6 lb. But I will admit that my car does agree with what I believe to be my most accurate gauge.
One explanation for you observations would be that the true pressure in your tires is in the vicinity of 2.350 bar, let's say. A tire that is just slightly on the low side would then read 33 psi on the car, and one that is just slightly higher would be reported as 35. 34 is skipped.
2.35 bar is 34.08 psi. Your gauge would need to be reading 1.1 pounds low - which I think is a very common level of gauge accuracy.
This is great. Thank you!I believe the system is fundamentally set up to report to a tenth of a bar. Here are some relevant pressures:
psi bar rounded 33 2.275 2.3 34 2.344 2.3 35 2.413 2.4 36 2.482 2.5 37 2.551 2.6 38 2.62 2.6
I never see my car report pressures of 34 or 37 pounds - because they are "covered" by rounded pressures of 2.3 and 2.6 bar, respectively. Since 0.1 bar is more than a psi, we effectively lose resolution in our units.
I wouldn't expect either the car or a gauge to be perfect. A good hand held gauge may be accurate to 1% of its full range, say 0.01 x 60 = 0.6 lb. But I will admit that my car does agree with what I believe to be my most accurate gauge.
One explanation for you observations would be that the true pressure in your tires is in the vicinity of 2.350 bar, let's say. A tire that is just slightly on the low side would then read 33 psi on the car, and one that is just slightly higher would be reported as 35. 34 is skipped.
2.35 bar is 34.08 psi. Your gauge would need to be reading 1.1 pounds low - which I think is a very common level of gauge accuracy.
This is why I like it. I always check my pressure screen once or twice during a drive for the warmed up pressure and to make sure I have no slow leaks. On a return trip home from my girlfriends condo, where some construction work is going on, I noticed the right rear was low. When I got home it was 4 PSI below the left rear and the usual warmed pressure. Inspected the tire and found the nail. I immediately plugged the tire. Had I missed this I might have gone out the next day to very low tire.I like having the TPMS because, not having a spare, I feel I can get a heads up on a slow leak from a nail. And then maybe being to save the tire.
I find it useful if I have a persistent low reading on my other vehicles.A question in a bit of a different direction on this subject: How much do we even need TPMS?
Most of us drove for decades before the little gizmos were invented. Are they a sales gimmick, I wonder, that started as a nice option only to become standard? Or are they essential for the track?
The reason I ask is that my experience with low-profile radials is that they have basically two modes, okay and spectacularly failed, lol. The old creeping, slow bead leaks of the past seem to have largely been eliminated. But then, I’m not tracking, so I wonder if that’s where they help most.
I drove from Houston to NYC with a tire that was losing about 3 psi/day due to a tiny nail. I found very comforting to have TPMS to detect if the rate of loss suddenly increased (because the nail was ejected). I had the tire repaired at the shop of my choice in Queens.A question in a bit of a different direction on this subject: How much do we even need TPMS?
Most of us drove for decades before the little gizmos were invented. Are they a sales gimmick, I wonder, that started as a nice option only to become standard? Or are they essential for the track?
The reason I ask is that my experience with low-profile radials is that they have basically two modes, okay and spectacularly failed, lol. The old creeping, slow bead leaks of the past seem to have largely been eliminated. But then, I’m not tracking, so I wonder if that’s where they help most.
I didn't mean it like that. I wasn't looking for an argument, just others' opinions. Sorry it came across that way, I didn't word it very well.Arguments like 'I am driving for 40 years and none of my previous cars had TPMS' do not hold any water for me.
Neither did I (word it very well) an argument in this case is a piece of logic, not that we are having an argument as in verbal fighting. Sorry about this, I came across as aggressive when I wasn't intending to be....I didn't mean it like that. I wasn't looking for an argument, just others' opinions. Sorry it came across that way, I didn't word it very well.
TPMS is actually a US federal mandate stemming from the whole Firestone and Ford Explorer roll over debacle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tire-pressure_monitoring_systemMost of us drove for decades before the little gizmos were invented. Are they a sales gimmick, I wonder, that started as a nice option only to become standard? Or are they essential for the track?
Ah. Thanks for that info.TPMS is actually a US federal mandate stemming from the whole Firestone and Ford Explorer roll over debacle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tire-pressure_monitoring_system