Joined
·
52 Posts
Curious what folks here would change...
Isnt that the T model you are talking about?Shave weight out of it by bringing safety, sound deadening, and luxury down to minimal levels and putting the body and chassis on a diet. The 911 is the luxurious grand tourer.
Ditto!If I was ceo, i d leave the 718 as is, its perfect.
hhmmmm I wouldnt mind an eCayman IF its a two seater sport car with a design in the lineage of the existing caymans.Ditto!
And I’d put a permanent ban on using the names “Boxster” or “Cayman” for an electric car.
Have to disagree. The Cayman grew out of the Boxster, which was named for Boxer-Roadster. There is no lineage there that leads to an all-new, electric car. Such a vehicle necessitates an all-new name, just as the Taycan was not e-Panamera.hhmmmm I wouldnt mind an eCayman IF its a two seater sport car with a design in the lineage of the existing caymans.
not at all like what Ford just did with the Mustang![]()
Whas that a reply for me?982 ?
Wouldn't it be easier to simply strip them of the 718 designation...I would recall the 718 Cayman GT4 and 718 Spyder and refit them with normally aspirated flat-four engines (and do the same to all future units to be produced).
A flat-six has no place in a car bearing the 718 moniker, that what the heritage tells us anyway ?
I thought the T is a Base with an option package. I'll have to look at it again.Isnt that the T model you are talking about?
Even less luxury than in a Base Stripper.
What more would you remove on a T ?
Have to disagree. The Cayman grew out of the Boxster, which was named for Boxer-Roadster. There is no lineage there that leads to an all-new, electric car. Such a vehicle necessitates an all-new name, just as the Taycan was not e-Panamera.